This is quite fascinating. Being the never-satisfied kind of person, have the roulette strategy is apparently not enough. Though it is possible, it is too damn troublesome to pull off, considering the numerous considerations and tediousness of the math.

So I have decided, with my little bit of newfound knowledge of universal patterns and non-local coherence, try to derive an explanation, and subsequently a strategy for the seemingly random lottery games.

As I have previously explained for roulette, deriving a viable formula counts very much on determining the valid points of reference. People who try to beat the table will always lose, simply because in the end they are really playing with the ball and wheel. Roulette, like blackjack, is easy to beat because the factors determining the results are so straightforward. Lottery is different.

Although we see the game as a set of random 7 numbers (here in SG it is 6 plus and extra number), the truth is the 7 numbers are 1 number. To be more precise, they are one body, which exceeds the modern constraints of numeric sequence. They can be better represented if we do not think of them as numbers at all. This is because regardless of the number, the ball they are imprinted on is almost exactly the same (at least under physical parameters).

So if 7 numbers form a shape, what is the “surface” upon which this shape travels? There is no apparent physical surface. The machine used to spin them must be disregarded; games only take place days apart, within which the machine would have been reconditioned.

The surface may be time, or something else. He challenge here is to determine the object which projects a non-local coherence to the, say 3 or 4 dimensional “chart” we plot with the series of shapes.

Another important consideration is that one result will not determine the next. At least that is what I believe. This is similarly due to the fact that the games are played days apart. It would be easy to visualize this thought in its entirety by taking the analogy of 2 mirrors, placed parallel to each other, with irregular surfaces.

If our knowledge / information is restricted to only 1 mirror face, we will only be able to know the points at which light have landed, but not the future points of landing. To know that, we have to be able to somehow observe the other mirror, and identify it as the corrent mirror of reference.

Anyways, while I have not put too much brainwork to this, I created a simple reference point and mapped a year of lottery results to it. The following is a graphical representation. It seems, from the graph, that what we think is random, is not so random afterall.